Sunday, September 7, 2008
Landlords Should Consider the Benefits of Allowing Pets
The City of Los Angeles has a noble goal: To be the first major metropolitan city in the United States to end euthanasia as a tool to control pet overpopulation. Achieving this difficult goal requires robust community participation.
During this time of economic uncertainty, we especially need the help of an important constituency in our community, our landlords.
According to the 2000 Census LA has 1,275,412 households. Of these, 63% or 803,510 households are rentals. According to a report issued by The Foundation for Interdisciplinary Research and Education Promoting Animal Welfare in 2005, 50% of all rentals nationally prohibit pets.
Consider these other report findings: 35% of tenants without pets would own a pet if their landlord permitted; tenants in pet-friendly housing stay an average of 46 months compared to 18 months for tenants in rentals prohibiting pets; the vacancy rate for pet-friendly housing was lower (10%) than “no pets allowed” rentals (14%); and 25% of applicants inquiring about rentals in non-pet-friendly housing were seeking pet-friendly rentals.
The report observes: “With such a sizable potential tenant pool it would seem there would be enough pet-friendly housing to meet the current demand. In fact, according to economic theory, in perfectly functioning markets [where people make rational, profit-maximizing decisions, with full information and no significant transaction costs] pet-friendly housing should be available to renters willing to pay a premium to cover any extra costs to landlords.” Begging the question, “Do landlords overlook opportunities to increase profits by not adding to the pool of pet-friendly housing?”
With nearly half of American households having companion animals and over half of renters who do not have pets reporting they would have one or more pets if allowed, why are there so few pet-friendly rental units available?
Well, among landlords who do not allow pets, damage was the greatest concern (64.7%), followed by noise (52.9%), complaints/tenant conflicts (41.2%) and insurance issues (41.2%). Concerns about people leaving their pet or not cleaning common areas were rarely cited (5.9%).
Although 85% of landlords permitting pets reported pet-related damage at some time, the worst damage averaged only $430. This is less than the typical rent or pet deposit. In most cases, landlords could simply subtract the damage from a pet deposit and experience no real loss. In fact, the report finds landlords appear to experience no substantive loss, and further, there is little, if any, difference in damage between tenants with and without pets.
Other pet-related issues (e.g., noise, tenant conflicts concerning animals or common area upkeep) required slightly less than one hour per year of landlord time. This was less time than landlords spent for child-related problems and other issues. Whatever time landlords spent addressing pet-related problems was offset by spending less marketing time on pet-friendly units by a margin of 8 hours per unit.
While the study finds problems arising from allowing pets are minimal, the benefits frequently outweigh the problems. Landlords stand to profit from allowing pets because, on average, tenants with pets are willing and able to pay more for the ability to live with their pets, (especially in unregulated rent situations such as all market-rate apartment units built in Los Angeles since 1978, which are exempt from rent control).
In the City of Los Angeles nearly 17,000 pets were euthanized over the past twelve months. This is an increase over previous years, reversing many years of steady decline. The increase is attributed to the large number of pets surrendered to City shelters this year because of the housing foreclosure crisis. Imagine if just twenty percent of the 400,000 pet restricted households in LA permitted pets. That could create a demand far greater than the number of homeless pets dying in our shelters, allowing LA to finally achieve its goal.
Landlords have been hearing from their own colleagues and professional journals recently that permitting pets makes good business sense. Nonetheless, the lack of available pet-friendly rentals reveals there is a long way to go to meet current demand. The report reveals many landlords may be overlooking an opportunity to increase revenue and tenant pools/market size by allowing pets. While there are some costs to allowing pets, these costs are relatively low and the benefits appear to be even greater for landlords.
The benefits to the thousands of homeless pets who are dying for lack of a home each year cannot be overstated. Landlords can make a profitable, life saving choice by permitting pets. After all, a house is not a home without a pet.
For more information on what is happening in LA's Animal Community visit From the Desk of Ed Boks.
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Timing the market can be big risk for first-time buyers
Well known author, Craig Guillot, with Bankrate.com, suggests they may be outsmarting themselves.
With home prices falling, surging inventories, and the threat of more foreclosures on the horizon, the housing market has been tilting strongly towards buyers in the past year. In some parts of the country, market-rate housing is falling back into affordable territories and those who were once priced out of the market are now taking a second look.
Some experts say real estate values still have a long way to fall, leaving potential first-time buyers wondering if they should hold out for lower prices. No doubt that's a good question, but waiting also carries the risk that interest rates and home prices could start rising. Experts say timing the market correctly is almost impossible and that for a traditional homeowner -- who should be taking a long-term outlook approach -- timing is irrelevant.
According to the National Association of Realtors, or NAR, the median price of a single-family home in the
The risk in waiting is that buyers could end up paying more than they need to, whether on the price of the home or the monthly payment because of the interest rates, says Bonnie Abbott, a professional real estate consultant.
Abbot cautions against generalizing the real estate market on a national level and says to look more at local factors. She says, for example, a community experiencing an influx of job opportunities may prevent the market from declining any further. She also points to the fact that many homes in all markets are still sold based on "life changes," such as births, divorces, deaths, downsizing and relocation, which means that people will continue to buy and sell homes no matter what the economy is doing.
Stuart McAfee, a Realtor with Oakhurst Properties in the
To read this interesting article in its entirety click here: “‘Timing’ market big risk for first-time buyers”
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Who pays what?
My clients often ask me who pays for which fees when selling or buying a house. Because this is such a common question and there seems to be so much confusion on the subject here is a list of who pays for what:
Real estate commission
Document preparation fee for Documentary transfer tax
Any city transfer/conveyance tax (according to contract)
Payoff of all loans in seller’s name (or existing loan balance if being assumed by buyer)
Interest accrued to lender being paid off, statement fees, reconveyance fees and prepayment penalties
Termite work (according to contract)
Any judgments, tax liens, etc., against the seller
Tax proration for any taxes unpaid at time of transfer of title
Any unpaid homeowner’s insurance
Recording charges to clear all documents of record against seller
Any bonds or assessments (according to contract)
Any and all delinquent taxes
Notary fees
Escrow fees
Title Insurance premium (Owner’s policy)
The Buyer Generally Pays:
Title insurance premium (Lender’s policy)
Escrow fee
Document preparation (if applicable)
Notary fees
Recording charges for all documents in buyer’s name
Termite inspection (according to contract)
Tax proration (from date of acquisition)
Homeowner’s transfer fee
All new loan charges (except those required by lender for seller to pay if applicable)
Interest on new loan from date of funding to 30 days prior to first payment date
Assumption/charge of record fees for takeover of existing loan
Inspection fees (roofing, property inspection, geological, etc.)
Home warranty (according to contract)
City transfer/conveyance tax (according to contract)
File insurance premium for first year
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
The Basics of Buying a Home
Obtain A Mortgage Preapproval Before You Begin House Hunting
> Learn how much financing is available to you
> Strengthen your bargaining position with sellers
Chose a Real Estate Agent
> Select a reputable professional who will listen to your needs and make you feel comfortable
> Ask agents for references from former clients
Find the Right Home
> Determine the needs of you and your family
> Create a wish list of desirable features
> Take notes as your preview homes
Make an Offer
> Your real estate agent presents your offer to the seller, who will accept, counter or reject it
> When the price is settled, you and the seller sign a Purchase Agreement, defining the terms of the sale
Have the Home Inspected
> Hire a professional home inspector after the offer has been accepted to provide an in-depth look at the basic systems of the house, to reveal any safety hazards and give you a chance to reconsider the deal
The Home Will Be Appraised
> An appraisal, required by your mortgage lender, is a formal, written estimate of the home's current market value
Obtain Title Insurance (where applicable)
> This guarantees that the property you are purchasing is free of liens or confusion in rights of ownership
> The policy insures against any losses to the property that result from defects in the title or deed
Close On the Property
> Ownership of the property is transferred
> A closing agent coordinates and distributes all the paperwork and funds
And you become the proud owner of your new home!
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
10 Tax Changes for 2008
1. More money for gas. The standard mileage deduction for business increases to 50.5 cents per mile. Note that mileage rates for medical or moving purposes fall to 19 cents per mile.
2. More money for retirement. You can contribute $5,000 to your IRA ($6,000 if you’re over 50) in 2008.
3. No breaks for sales taxes. The provision permitting taxpayers to deduct state sales taxes – a big plus in states with no income tax – expired at the end of 2007.
4. More tax breaks for retirement savings. Married taxpayers with joint income of up to $85,000 will be able to deduct IRA contributions if they file jointly; individuals with income of up to $53,000 can take the deduction.
5. Higher standard deduction. If you’re one of the two-thirds of taxpayers who don’t itemize, you’ll be able to deduct $10,900 as a married couple filing jointly ($5,450 for singles) in 2008.
6. No tax on some capital gains. Joint filers whose taxable income doesn’t exceed $65,100 and single filers with income that doesn’t exceed $32,550 don’t have to pay any tax on capital gains they realize in 2008; the rate for other taxpayers remains at 15 percent.
7. More time to sell a house when you lose a spouse. Taxpayers who lose a spouse now have up to two years after that death to take the maximum exclusion of $500,000 in gain on the sale of a principal residence. The other requirements for the exclusion must have been met before the death.
8. Less money back for some hybrid cars. While buying a hybrid car can still save you taxes, the tax credit has been phased out on many popular models such as the Toyota Prius. Check out the 2008 Model Year Hybrid List at www.irs.gov before you buy.
9. Tougher taxes for kids. Children 18 and under or full-time students up to 24 years old will pay taxes at their parent’s tax rate for investment income over $1,700. Note that this rate doesn’t apply to wages a child earns.
10. Higher cutoffs for Social Security. The maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security tax increases to $102,000 in 2008.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Home Improvements: Which Projects Pay-Off?

RETURN ON INVESTMENT
While few renovations can be expected to fully pay for themselves come resale time, some clearly hold their value better than others. The Wall Street Journal recently published the national average costs and estimated returns for a number of different home improvement projects. Here’s how they stack up:
KITCHEN REMODELING – The kitchen is the heart of the home for most people, so it’s usually a good place to invest – especially if yours is an older home with outdated kitchen features and appliances. The average spent on a major midrange kitchen remodeling job in the U.S. is $43,804 and returns 75 percent, while $68,962 is spent for a major upscale remodeling and returns 80 percent.
ADDING A DECK – In many areas of the country, buyers no longer consider decks to be upgrades, but rather a standard feature. Decks are also one of the most reliable home improvement values, averaging about $6,300 to build but recouping an impressive 104 percent of their cost at resale time.
WINDOW REPLACEMENTS – Replacing old and drafty windows makes sense from both an energy efficiency and resale standpoint. You’ll see the savings almost immediately on your utility bill, and window replacements are a pretty good investment, too. The average of $15,557 spent on an upscale window replacement job returns 87 percent, and the $9,586 spent on a midrange window replacement job returns 85 percent.
SIDING REPLACEMENT – Replacing old or worn-out siding ranked #2 on the list of highest returns, right behind decks. At an average cost of $7,329, siding replacement returns 98 percent of the investment.
FINISHED BASEMENTS – Finished basements have become one of the most popular home improvements. They’re not a bad investment either. The average basement remodeling job costs $43,865 and returns 79 percent of the investment – not to mention the money saved in movie tickets!
EXTERIOR PAINTING – This is not technically a home improvement, but rather a home maintenance project. In most areas of the country, home exteriors, (wood and siding) should be repainted every 3 – 5 years. So you ned to make a judgement call regarding repainting your home exterior if you’re getting the home ready to sell, since you’ll recoup about 81 percent of the average cost of $3,250. If the home is in obvious need of repainting, you’ll probably need to make the investment if you want to give your home the best chance of selling quickly and at the highest possible price.
Of course, the return on investment is just one factor when considering home renovations. Your primary reason for making renovations should be because you will enjoy them yourself (especially since improvements made in the year before a home’s sale only return an average of 70 to 80 cents on the dollar.)
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Ignore the Headlines
Thursday, Feb. 14, 2008
Ignore the Headlines
By Dan Kadlec
Famed Money Manager is perhaps best known for his timeless wisdom that you can beat the pros by focusing on stocks of companies where you either work or shop or have some other edge. But a more relevant Lynchism today is this gem: Ignore the headlines.
That's no easy thing. How do you tune out all the chatter and ink on recession, housing, subprime woes, the credit crunch, rogue traders, insolvent bond insurers, $100 oil and nukes in Iran? It's enough to make you sit on your thumbs and wait before making any big moves. But what, exactly, are you waiting for?
There has rarely been a moment in history when you couldn't scare yourself into doing nothing. And yet, as Lynch observed nearly 20 years ago, "in spite of all the great and minor calamities that have occurred ... all the thousands of reasons that the world might be coming to an end--owning stocks has continued to be twice as rewarding as owning bonds."
A top reason to not buy stocks, in Lynch's view, is if you don't already own a home--in which case, that should be your first investment, since an owner-occupied home is nearly always profitable. Through a spokesman, Lynch reaffirmed these views to me--housing debacle and all.
When prices are falling, few people have the discipline to buy stocks, a house, gold, art or any other asset. But those who do pull the trigger excel in the long run. As John D. Rockefeller famously said, "The way to make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets."
And the streets are stained crimson. Start with stocks. They have been pummeled this year. GDP braked sharply last quarter, and there has been plenty of panic about a recession. The Federal Reserve is slashing short-term interest rates at the fastest clip in decades. But if you stick to your steady, diversified plan while everyone else is retreating, you will be happy years from now. For one thing, Fed rate cuts always lift the economy eventually, and the stock market typically starts responding just as headlines get gloomiest. Sure, the market could fall again before recovering. But the recession may be half over already--or we may avoid one altogether. You just never know.
As for housing, certainly some skepticism is in order. Formerly sizzling markets in Florida, Nevada, Arizona and California probably haven't seen the worst headlines just yet, though they may well be close. And "jumbo" mortgages, those more than $417,000, are likely to remain artificially high for a few more months while banks work through their credit issues.
But let's say you are emotionally ready to be a homeowner. You have good credit, plan to stay put for five years and have been waiting for the perfect entry point. It's time to get serious--before an inevitable rise in interest rates wipes out your advantage. "The thing that will make home prices stop falling is the very same thing that will push mortgage rates higher," says Jim Svinth, chief economist at mortgage firm Lending Tree. So anything you gain by a further drop in prices might be offset by rising financing costs.
Consider a typical home that sells for $218,900. You put down 20% and get a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at today's rate of 5.5%. Monthly principal and interest come to $994.31. Let's say that 12 months from now the same house goes for 10% less, or $197,010. But by then the recession is history and the Fed is jacking up rates to stem inflation. If mortgage costs rise a point, to 6.5%, your monthly payment would be $994.94 and you'd have saved nothing. Meanwhile, home prices might steady and sellers might become less willing to negotiate. And you have spent a year living someplace you'd rather not be.
It's more complicated if you must sell before you can buy. But that logjam won't persist forever--and if it appears you'll be trapped for a few years, try to refinance at today's lower rates. Risks always seem most acute when the headlines give you ulcers. But that's exactly when you should think long term--and get off your thumbs.
[This article contains a table. Please see hardcopy of magazine.]
Due to an inputting error in information supplied by Lending Tree, the original version of this article contained incorrect data in an example assessing the relative cost savings of buying a home today or waiting a year for the housing market to drop 10%.
Find this article at: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1713483,00.html